<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Jakub Anderwald &#187; bug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://anderwald.info/tag/bug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://anderwald.info</link>
	<description>Yet Another Tech Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 23 Nov 2011 09:11:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Client certificate mapping in IIS 7 / 7.5 and impersonation</title>
		<link>http://anderwald.info/iis/client-certificate-mapping-in-iis-7-7-5-and-impersonation/</link>
		<comments>http://anderwald.info/iis/client-certificate-mapping-in-iis-7-7-5-and-impersonation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Oct 2011 18:43:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakub "Kocureq" Anderwald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[certificate]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anderwald.info/?p=312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Recently, when migrating an application that uses client certificate authentication to IIS 7, we noticed that ASP.NET impersonation stopped working. Client was authenticated properly, but connection to database server was being established with machine account (DOMAIN\SERVERNAME$). We didn&#8217;t find any issue in the configuration, so we raised the case with Microsoft support. It turns out [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anderwald.info/iis/client-certificate-mapping-in-iis-7-7-5-and-impersonation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Unexpected IIS stop</title>
		<link>http://anderwald.info/iis/unexpected-iis-stop/</link>
		<comments>http://anderwald.info/iis/unexpected-iis-stop/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Sep 2010 14:29:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakub "Kocureq" Anderwald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IIS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[restart]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unexpected]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anderwald.info/?p=282</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We had a weird case some time ago on one of our Windows 2003 server. After we made changes to IIS configuration, more specifically &#8211; one virtual folder &#8211; the whole IIS stopped. This of course caused outage for some applications, some were switched over to secondary server by load balancer. User making the change [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anderwald.info/iis/unexpected-iis-stop/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nesting FORM tags in (X)HTML</title>
		<link>http://anderwald.info/internet/nesting-form-tags-in-xhtml/</link>
		<comments>http://anderwald.info/internet/nesting-form-tags-in-xhtml/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:58:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakub "Kocureq" Anderwald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[html]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tag]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[xhtml]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anderwald.info/?p=61</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Due to ASP.NET&#8217;s requirements with regards to server side controls being in one big FORM tag, I started looking at nesting FORM tags in one (X)HTML document. Formalities First, let&#8217;s have a look at the official documents. HTML 4 specification says A form can contain text and markup (paragraphs, lists, etc.) in addition to form [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anderwald.info/internet/nesting-form-tags-in-xhtml/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>10</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>It&#8217;s a feature, it&#8217;s not a bug</title>
		<link>http://anderwald.info/it/its-a-feature-its-not-a-bug/</link>
		<comments>http://anderwald.info/it/its-a-feature-its-not-a-bug/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Mar 2008 14:53:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Jakub "Kocureq" Anderwald</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bug]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FireWire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://anderwald.info/it/its-a-feature-its-not-a-bug/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OK, I know all of you heard this once or twice. Or even said that sometimes, maybe to cover up some bug, maybe because it was true. But I think there should be some border, after which you don&#8217;t say that maic phrase anymore. The &#8220;IT-guy&#8221; inside you (AKA conscience in the real world) should [...]
No related posts.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://anderwald.info/it/its-a-feature-its-not-a-bug/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

